For this weeks module, we discuss a man named Jonathan Kuniholm - an industrial designer, USMC vet, a prosthetic revolutionary, and an all around good guy.
It goes like this - Kuniholm, a USMC vet, goes back to school to get a degree in industrial design, works after a brief stent as a tackle designer, became bored with civilian life, and re-enlisted to regain that challenge in his life he had years back because he's a BAMF. During New Years day in 2005, Kuniholm was ambushed by Iraqi insurgents who initiated an attack by setting off an IED which injured the majorty of his platoon and caused Kuniholm to lose his right arm. After a few muscle surgery's and five months of rehabilitation, Kuniholm was fitted with a few prosthetic arms and began his re-entry into "civi life".
So, instead of just collecting his early medical discharge retirement. John, being the educated man he is, decides to use his smarts in order to make these outdated prosthetic better. This is when he joined a DARPA project called Revolutionizing Prosthetics in which Kuniholm utilized his diverse military and industrial designing backgrounds to helped in making these outdated prosthetics up to modern technological standards.Thus, The Open Prosthetics Project was born.
The Open Prosthetics Project, with the help of Kuniholm, are currently working on a variety of advancements for prosthetic technology. The first is a myoelectric, or "myo", prosthesis converts the movements of the muscles remaining in his arm into motorized hand and wrist movements. The second, is a body-powered prosthesis with cables and bands that allow him to shrug his shoulder and extend his arm. The third is a shorter arm useful for work and fun, allowing s person to hold a drawing pen or a guitar pick. There are currently a number of different improvements being worked on in this project from technologically advanced hybrid rubber materials to future nano-instrumentation's within the protheitics itself.
Cool huh.
Open Prosthetics Project
www.openprosthetics.org
Do you respond to polls?
Saturday, November 19, 2011
Saturday, November 12, 2011
In Neutral.
In today's post, I will briefly explain the term "Network Neutrality", why it is important to you, and why Comcast services suck in general.
Alright, so here we have the modern day high-speed internet - a super-happy fun place where you can do about anything information and entertainment wise from watching stupid videos to posting how big your last BM was on some social network for the whole world to see. Cool right? All of these pieces of data are considered equal and are permitted through a principle called network neutrality - or better known as a part of that junk you would see in the first amendment.
Ok, what if some of that content was blocked or "capped". That would suck and people would (and do) complain because this violates net neutrality. This is something that has come up in recent years as the FCC wants to help take control of what traffic and content is allowed through major internet providers seemingly one at a time. Comcast, one of the first providers partially affected by the FCC wave, prevents its users from complete net neutrality by denying full permissions to access certain peer 2 peer (P2P) traffic and particular streaming websites such as Netflix without paying an extra fee to the provider itself.
I understand that conglomerate Internet/Phone/Cable companies don't want your computer to turn into a free Cable/Phone/Entertainment machine because they'd lose money on there other services, but that doesn't give them the right to censor certain aspects of the internet that we pay a solid 80+ bucks a month for because they monopolized other sensible providers..
.. oh yeah -
http://comcastsucksballs.blogspot.com/
http://comcastsucks.org/
- free speech at its finest.
Alright, so here we have the modern day high-speed internet - a super-happy fun place where you can do about anything information and entertainment wise from watching stupid videos to posting how big your last BM was on some social network for the whole world to see. Cool right? All of these pieces of data are considered equal and are permitted through a principle called network neutrality - or better known as a part of that junk you would see in the first amendment.
Ok, what if some of that content was blocked or "capped". That would suck and people would (and do) complain because this violates net neutrality. This is something that has come up in recent years as the FCC wants to help take control of what traffic and content is allowed through major internet providers seemingly one at a time. Comcast, one of the first providers partially affected by the FCC wave, prevents its users from complete net neutrality by denying full permissions to access certain peer 2 peer (P2P) traffic and particular streaming websites such as Netflix without paying an extra fee to the provider itself.
I understand that conglomerate Internet/Phone/Cable companies don't want your computer to turn into a free Cable/Phone/Entertainment machine because they'd lose money on there other services, but that doesn't give them the right to censor certain aspects of the internet that we pay a solid 80+ bucks a month for because they monopolized other sensible providers..
.. oh yeah -
http://comcastsucksballs.blogspot.com/
http://comcastsucks.org/
- free speech at its finest.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)